English
引用本文:田新苗,郝新梅,马孝义,等.微喷灌田间管网的优化研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2019,38(4):63-70.
TIAN Xinmiao,HAO Xinmei,MA Xiaoyi,et al.微喷灌田间管网的优化研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2019,38(4):63-70.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1306次   下载 1061 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
微喷灌田间管网的优化研究
田新苗, 郝新梅, 马孝义, 柳烨
1.中国农业大学, 北京 100083; 2.西北农林科技大学, 陕西 杨凌 712100
摘要:
出水口的位置不同,田间管网布置方案也不同,从而影响田间管网的投资费用,以往的研究大多忽略了出水口位置对管网投资的影响。【目的】探究在自压供水条件下,出水口位置对田间管网建设费用的影响。【方法】分别对出水口位于地块一角、地块一边、地块中间3种情形建立以毛管长度、支管管径为决策变量,以微喷灌田间管网总投资最小为目标的优化模型,采用变径设计,选用遗传算法求解。【结果】与传统规范设计方案相比,出水口位于地块一角、一边和中间的模型优化方案,管道投资分别降低了20.0%、9.5%、23.9%。对比规范设计结果,出水口位于地块一边的管网投资最小,比出水口位于地块一角的布置方案投资降低了13.4%,出水口位于地块中间比位于一角时布置方案投资降低了7.2%;对比模型优化结果,出水口位于地块中间比出水口位于地块一角和出水口位于地块一边时田间管网投资分别降低了11.8%、9.9%。【结论】模型优化结果节省投资明显,模型优化结果显示出水口位于中间毛管双向布置时投资最省。
关键词:  微喷灌; 田间管网; 优化设计; 遗传算法
DOI:10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.20180426
分类号:
基金项目:
Optimizing the Field Pipe Network of Micro-sprinkler Irrigation System
TIAN Xinmiao , HAO Xinmei , MA Xiaoyi , LIU Ye
1.China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China; 2. Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, China
Abstract:
【Objective】Most existing study on optimizing micro-irrigation pipe network did not consider the outlet position despite its importance. This paper aims to elicit this for the pipe network under natural pressure.【Method】We analyzed three scenarios assuming the outlet was on corner, on one side, and on center of the field; the objective of the optimization was to minimize the investment with the length and diameter of both capillary and branch pipes as the decision variables. The optimization problem was solved using the genetic algorithm. 【Result】Compared to standard design protocol, the optimized results obtained from the proposed model reduced the costs of the pipelines by 20%, 15.2% and 23.9%, when outlet was on corner, one-side outlet and center of the field respectively. The one-side outlet was the cheapest for pipe network, saving 7.6% and 7.2% compared to the corner and central outlet respectively. We chose unidirectional capillary layout for the outlet at the corner and on one side, and the bidirectional one was used for outlet in the middle. For the field network, the cheapest is central outlet, saving 11.8% and 9.9% respectively, compared to corner and side outlet respectively.【Conclusion】Application of the optimization model can save costs of field pipe network, and for the three scenarios we examined, the central outlet was most economically efficient.
Key words:  micro-irrigation; field network; design optimization; GA