English
引用本文:徐建新,王 潜,高 阳,等.水盐胁迫对玉米茎木质部水力特性的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2020,39(1):45-51.
,et al.水盐胁迫对玉米茎木质部水力特性的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2020,39(1):45-51.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1428次   下载 1148 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
水盐胁迫对玉米茎木质部水力特性的影响
徐建新,王 潜,高 阳,孙景生,侯泽林
1.华北水利水电大学,郑州 450000;2.中国农业科学院 农田灌溉研究所,河南 新乡 453000
摘要:
【目的】探讨水盐胁迫下玉米茎木质部水力特征、光合作用和生长指标的响应,深入探究水盐胁迫诱导茎木质部栓塞形成的机理。【方法】通过室内玉米桶栽试验,设置水分胁迫(LD)、盐分胁迫(WS)和水盐联合胁迫(SY)3个胁迫处理,以无水盐胁迫处理作为对照(CK),研究水、盐胁迫及水盐联合胁迫对玉米叶、根水势及玉米茎木质部水力特性的影响。【结果】与CK相比,在水、盐胁迫或水盐联合胁迫下,玉米根、叶水势均有明显降低,叶-土水势差从大到小的顺序依次为CK>LD处理>WS处理>SY处理;茎干的初始水力导度Ki和茎流速率明显降低,其变化趋势与叶-土系统水势差变化趋势一致,相应地茎木质部水力导度损失百分比PLC显著增高;同时,玉米叶片的净光合速率Pn、蒸腾速率Tr、气孔导度Gs呈CK>LD处理、WS处理>SY处理,生长指标株高和叶片长度均呈CK>LD处理>WS处理>SY处理。【结论】水、盐胁迫和水盐联合胁迫均会降低玉米水势,使植株体内渗透势平衡遭到破坏,导致玉米光合性能受到抑制,使茎木质部内产生空穴化和栓塞现象,且不同胁迫方式会导致不同程度的栓塞程度。
关键词:  水盐胁迫;水力导度;栓塞;茎流;水势;光合作用
DOI:10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2019300
分类号:
基金项目:
Change in hydraulic characteristics of maize in response to water and salinity stresses
XU Jianxin, WANG Qian, GAO Yang, SUN Jingsheng, HOU Zelin
1. North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450000, China; 2. Farmland Irrigation Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang 453000, China
Abstract:
【Objective】Drought and salinity are most common abiotic stresses impending crop growth, and understanding how crops hydraulically respond to these stresses is imperative for improving agronomic management. In this paper, we present the results of an experimental study on the impact of water and salinity stresses on water characteristics of maize.【Method】The experiment was conducted in a phytotron and consisted of four treatments: water stress (LD), salt stress (WS), coupled water and salt stress (SY); the control was without stress (CK). In each treatment, we measured leaf water potential, root water potential and stem hydraulic conductivity of the maize. 【Result】Compared with CK, LD, WS and SY reduced water potential in both root and leaf noticeably. In all treatments, the difference between water potential in the leaf and the soil was in the order of CK>LD>WS>SY. Water and salinity stresses both reduced initial hydraulic conductivity and sap flow rate in a similar way as their impact on the difference between water potential in the leaf and the soil; they led to an increase in the percentage of hydraulic conductivity loss of the stem xylem (PLC). Water stress reduced net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate and stomatal conductance, and coupling water and salt stresses reduced these traits further. Plant height and leaf length in all treatments was in the order CK>LD>WS>SY.【Conclusion】Water and salt stresses in separation or in coupling both reduced water potential and imbalanced osmotic potential in the plant, thereby inhibiting photosynthesis and embolizing the stem xylem network, although the embolization varied with types and degree of the stresses.
Key words:  water and salt stress; hydraulic conductivity; embolism; sap flow; water potential; photosynthesis