| 引用本文: | 刘军政,白绍斌,张新华,等.江河源头区生态补偿标准测算方法研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2020,39(5):120-126. |
| LIU Junzheng1, 2, BAI Shaobin3, ZHANG Xinhua4*, FAN Xichao1, 2, HUANG Huojian5, ZHAO Zhongnan5,LIU Junzheng1, 2, BAI Shaobin3, ZHANG Xinhua4*, FAN Xichao1, 2, HUANG Huojian5, ZHAO Zhongnan5,LIU Junzheng1, 2, BAI Shaobin3, ZHANG Xinhua4*, FAN Xichao1, 2, HUANG Huojian5, ZHAO Zhongnan5,et al.江河源头区生态补偿标准测算方法研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2020,39(5):120-126. |
|
| |
|
|
| 本文已被：浏览 1150次 下载 990次 |
码上扫一扫！ |
|
|
| 江河源头区生态补偿标准测算方法研究 |
|
刘军政，白绍斌,张新华，范习超，黄火键，赵钟楠
|
|
1.中国农业科学院 农田灌溉研究所，河南 新乡 453002； 2.农业部节水灌溉工程重点实验室，河南 新乡 453002；3.四川省水利厅，成都 610017；4.四川大学 水力学及山区河流开发保护国家重点实验室，成都 610065；5.水利部水利水电规划设计总院，北京 100011
|
|
| 摘要: |
| 江河源头区生态、经济和社会特征突出，常规生态补偿方法在江河源头区适用性存在问题。【目的】提出江河源头区生态补偿标准测算方法。【方法】通过皮尔曲线和土地利用占比分别赋予主体功能价值和次要功能价值不同的权重，确定了主体功能法的2种补偿标准测算方法。以雅砻江支流安宁河源头区作为典型进行实例计算，并与常规生态补偿方法的计算结果进行了对比分析。【结果】核算金额大小关系：生态系统服务功能法（23.15亿）＞主体功能法1（皮尔曲线5.89亿）＞主体功能法2（土地利用5.68亿）＞机会成本法（4.93亿）＞条件价值法（1.92亿）。按照主体功能法实施生态补偿后，源头区上下游人均财政收入差距从原来的2.5倍缩小到1.1倍左右。【结论】本研究提出的主体功能法充分考虑了源头区的生态特征、社会的经济发展阶段以及补偿主体的可承受能力，能够有效调整源头区上下游损益关系，并且2种主体功能法中的主要与次要功能价值权重确定客观，具有普适性。 |
| 关键词: 江河源头区；主体功能法；皮尔曲线；土地利用；生态补偿 |
| DOI：10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2019419 |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| A Proposed Ecological Compensation Method for Headwater Region of Rivers |
|
LIU Junzheng1, 2, BAI Shaobin3, ZHANG Xinhua4*, FAN Xichao1, 2, HUANG Huojian5, ZHAO Zhongnan5,LIU Junzheng1, 2, BAI Shaobin3, ZHANG Xinhua4*, FAN Xichao1, 2, HUANG Huojian5, ZHAO Zhongnan5,LIU Junzheng1, 2, BAI Shaobin3, ZHANG Xinhua4*, FAN Xichao1, 2, HUANG Huojian5, ZHAO Zhongnan5,et al
|
|
1. Farmland Irrigation Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang 453002, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Watersaving Irrigation Engineering, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Xinxiang, 453002, China; 3. Sichuan Provincial Water Resources Department, Chengdu 610017, China; 4. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China; 5. The Ministry of water conservancy and hydropower planning and Design Institute, Beijing 100011, China
|
| Abstract: |
| 【Objective】Ecological and socioeconomic characteristics of headwater of a river are unique and its ecological compensation cannot be calculated using the conventional ecological compensation method. The purpose of this paper is to present a dominant ecological function method (DEFM) to resolve this problem.【Method】Different weights were assigned to the main function and the minor function, and the values of the weights were determined by the Pearl curve or proportion of the land use. These weights were then used to calculate the main function and the secondary function. The model was applied to a headwater region in Anning River Basin - a tributary of the Yalong River. The results obtained from the proposed method were compared with those obtained from the conventional ecological compensation method. 【Result】The amount of ecological compensation was ranked in: Ecosystem service value (2 315 million)>DEFM1 (589 million) > DEFM2 (568 million)>The opportunity cost (493 million) > Contingent value method (192 million). Implementing the ecological compensation based on the DEFM could reduce the difference in tourism income between the top and bottom of the headwater from 2.5 times to 1.1 times. 【Conclusion】The proposed DFEM considered the ecological characteristics of the headwater, social development level and the affordability of the compensation subject. It can effectively balance the loss and profile of both upstream and downstream of the headwater region. |
| Key words: headwater region of rivers; DEFM; Pearl curve; land use; ecological compensation |
|
|
|
|
