| 引用本文: | 侯苗,杨星,张馨元,等.农业水价综合改革验收办法对比分析及国家改革验收建议[J].灌溉排水学报,0,():-. |
| HOU Miao,YANG Xing,ZHANG Xin-yuan,et al.农业水价综合改革验收办法对比分析及国家改革验收建议[J].灌溉排水学报,0,():-. |
|
| 摘要: |
| 【目的】我国农业水价综合改革自2016年在全国范围内启动,10年之旅已历程过半。但仅有部分基础条件较好的地区,例如上海、浙江、江苏等,基本完成改革任务和省级验收工作,三地的改革也进入到成果巩固和等待相关国家部委验收的阶段。三地的省级验收办法具有地方特色和差异性,对其上位政策符合性和异同点进行对比分析,有利于后续国家部委改革验收工作的开展,也有助于其他改革区域机制建设时参考。【方法】从验收组织和验收指标两方面,在剖析国家改革要点的基础上,对三地改革验收组织、验收指标体系的完整性和差异性进行系统的对比分析,同时,对国家验收流程和标准的制定提供建议。【结果】三地验收指标均覆盖到了全部的国家改革要点,体系完整,但各地验收指标系统结构存在较大的差异。【结论】建议国家尽快构建一套简单易行的国家级验收评价标准,同时,应根据改革区域经济社会发展的水平,分区域制定验收指标的量化考核要求。 |
| 关键词: 农业;水价改革;验收;指标体系;建议 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号:TV93；S27 |
| 基金项目:江苏省水利科技项目(2019043)；江苏省科技厅自主立项科研项目(BM2018028) |
|
| Comparison of the Acceptance Inspection Method for Integrated Agricultural Water Pricing Reform and Suggestions for National Acceptance Inspection |
|
HOU Miao, YANG Xing, ZHANG Xin-yuan, JU Yan, ZHANG Wen-ye, WU Wang
|
|
Jiangsu Hydraulic Research Institute
|
| Abstract: |
| 【Objectives】 In China, a nationwide integrated agricultural water pricing reform (NIAWPR) has been launched since 2016, and it has been more than half through 10-year reform plan. Only some areas with relatively good basic conditions, such as Shanghai, Zhejiang and Jiangsu, have completed the reform tasks and provincial acceptance inspection (PAI), and the reform in the three areas has entered the stage of consolidating the achievements and waiting for the national acceptance inspection (NAI). Considering the local characteristics and differences of the PAI methods in the three areas, a comparative analysis is made on the compliance of these methods compared with the national policies, and the difference analysis of these methods. It is not only conducive to the NAI, but also helpful to the reference of other reform regions in mechanism construction. 【Method】 This paper systematically analyzes the key points of NIAWPR and the integrity and differences of the PAI methods in the three areas from the two aspects of the PAI organization and PAI indexes, and at the same time, provides suggestions for the formulation of NAI. 【Result】 The PAI of the three areas is complete, covering all the key points of NIAWPR, but there are great differences in the structure of the PAI indexes. 【Conclusion】 It is suggested that a set of simple and feasible NAI standards should be established as soon as possible. Meanwhile, the quantitative requirements of NAI indexes should be formulated according to the level of economic and social development of reform regions |
| Key words: Agriculture; Water pricing reform; Acceptance inspection; Indexes; Suggestions |
