English
引用本文:李彦彬,冯娅,边泽鹏,等.花前干旱胁迫对冬小麦生长指标的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,0,():-.
Li Yan-bin,Feng Ya,Bian Ze-peng,et al.花前干旱胁迫对冬小麦生长指标的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,0,():-.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1507次   下载 0  
分享到: 微信 更多
花前干旱胁迫对冬小麦生长指标的影响
李彦彬1, 冯娅1, 边泽鹏1, 李道西1, 朱亚南2
1.华北水利水电大学 河南 郑州;2.常熟市河道管理处
摘要:
【目的】研究干旱胁迫对冬小麦生长指标的影响。【方法】选用周麦22为试验材料,在拔节期和抽穗期分别设置轻度干旱(土壤含水率控制在田间持水率的60%~70%)、中度干旱(土壤含水率控制在田间持水率的 50%~60%)和重度干旱(土壤含水率控制在田间持水率的40%~50%),对比分析了冬小麦根系形态、根系分布、株高及叶面积的变化过程。【结果】干旱胁迫处理根长相比CK均降低,T1、T2、T3处理总根长随干旱程度的加深而增长;经过连续处理的各根系特征在轻旱、中旱条件下均大于单阶段处理,重旱条件下各根系特征则明显降低;但复水后拔节期处理的根系补偿恢复能力高于抽穗期。随着干旱胁迫程度及时间增加,根系向下伸展生长,使各根系指标向深层转移,但根系总体绝对量明显减少,T9处理根干质量相比CK降低64.79%,并且株高、叶面积所受的抑制增大。其中拔节期对株高影响更大,T1、T2、T3处理株高相比CK降低3.78%、7.59%、16.09%;抽穗期对叶面积影响更大,T4、T5、T6处理叶面积相比CK降低8.11%、23.45%、29.43%;而经连续干旱处理后的株高和叶面积都明显低于各单阶段处理;抽穗期经干旱胁迫处理的株高、叶面积在干旱胁迫一周后就表现出较强补偿效应,而拔节期表现则相对迟缓;在经历连续干旱胁迫后均无明显补偿。【结论】在冬小麦实际生产中应避免连续干旱,花前若需控水,应尽量满足拔节期供水,控水在抽穗期保持轻旱水平。
关键词:  干旱复水;冬小麦;根系;株高;叶面积
DOI:
分类号:S279.2
基金项目:国家自然科学( 51779093) ; 河南省高校科技创新团队支持计划项目(17IRTSHN026)。
Effects of f Anthesis Drought and Rehydration Before Flowering on Growth Indexes of Winter Wheat
Li Yan-bin1, Feng Ya1, Bian Ze-peng1, Li Dao-xi1, Zhu Ya-nan2
1.North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power;2.Changshu River Management Office
Abstract:
Due to the global climate change, the intensity, frequency and scope of influence of agricultural drought disasters are increasing.In China,the annual grain production is reduced by 100~15 billion kg,due to drought and the quality of agricultural products is reduced,which is a direct threat to the national food security. Wheat is an important food and economic crop in China and it occupies an important position in food production. Therefore,to explore how crops respond to the changes of drought environment,and improve the resistance to drought stress and adaptability to drought environment are the key scientific problems to be solved urgently.【Objective】To study the effect of drought stress on growth indexes of winter wheat.【Method】Select Zhoumai 22 as the test material, and set mild drought (soil moisture content controlled at 60% to 70% of field water holding rate) and moderate drought (soil moisture content controlled at field) during jointing and heading stages. Water holding rate of 50%~60%) and severe drought (soil water content controlled at 40%~50% of field water holding rate), comparative analysis of the change process of winter wheat root morphology, root distribution, plant height and leaf area.【Results】Compared with CK, the root length of the drought stress treatment was reduced, and the total root length of the T1, T2, T3 treatments increased with the deepening of the drought; the root characteristics of the continuous treatments were greater than that of the single-stage treatment under light and medium drought conditions , Under severe drought conditions, the characteristics of each root system were significantly reduced; but after rewatering, the root compensation and restoration ability of the jointing stage treatment was higher than the heading stage. With the increase of drought stress and time, the root system expands and grows downwards, so that the root index is transferred to the deep layer, but the total absolute amount of root system is significantly reduced. Compared with CK, the root dry mass of T9 treatment is reduced by 64.79%, and the plant height and leaf area are reduced. The inhibition increases. The jointing stage has a greater impact on plant height. Compared with CK, the plant height of T1, T2, and T3 treatments is reduced by 3.78%, 7.59%, and 16.09%; the heading stage has a greater impact on the leaf area, and the leaf area of T4, T5 and T6 treatments is compared CK decreased by 8.11%, 23.45%, 29.43%; while the plant height and leaf area after continuous drought treatment were significantly lower than each single-stage treatment; the plant height and leaf area treated by drought stress at heading stage were reduced after one week of drought stress Shows a strong compensation effect, but the jointing stage performance is relatively slow; there is no obvious compensation after continuous drought stress. 【Conclusion】In the actual production of winter wheat, continuous drought should be avoided. If water control is required before flowering, the water supply at the jointing stage should be met as much as possible, and the water control should be maintained at a light drought level during the heading stage.
Key words:  drought and rewatering; winter wheat; root system; plant height; leaf area