中文
Cite this article:
【Print this page】   【Download the full text in PDF】   View/Add Comment  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←Previous Article|Next article→ Archive    Advanced Search
This article has been:Browse 186Times   Download 121Times 本文二维码信息
scan it!
Font:+|=|-
DOI:10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2023294
Using Weight-TOPSIS method to evaluate water saving levels in the beneficiary areas of the Yangtze-to-Huaihe water transportation project
WANG Min, FENG Yuehua, TAO Jie, MA Li, WANG Hui, YANG Haochen, LI He
1. Henan Provincial Water Conservancy Research Institute / Center of Efficient Irrigation Engineering and Technology Research of Henan Province, Zhengzhou 450003, China; 2. Henan Yudong Water Conservancy Guarantee Center, Kaifeng 475000, China; 3. School of Water Conservancy Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China; 4. Henan Yangtze-to-Huaihe Water Diversion CO.LTD., Zhengzhou 450000, China; 5. Henan Keda Water Conservancy Survey and Design Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450003, China
Abstract:
【Objective】The Yangtze-to-Huaihe hydraulic project was initiated in 2016 to move water from the Yangtze River to the Huai River to alleviate water shortage in the latter. In this paper, we analyze water saving levels in the beneficiary areas located in Henan province.【Method】We selected 11 water-related indexes covering agriculture, industry, living and ecological environment in the comprehensive analysis to establish an index system to evaluate water-saving levels in the beneficiary areas. A TOPSIS model was then derived, based on the combined weight of AHP-CRITIC method to evaluate water-saving levels in 2020.【Result】Among the nine counties we studied in the analysis, one county (Yongcheng) reached grade I, five counties (Liangyuan, Luyi, Suiyang, Zhecheng and Xiayi) reached grade II, and three counties (Dancheng, Huaiyang, Taikang) reached grade III water saving levels. Overall, water-saving levels in the beneficiary areas were higher. Water consumption per 10000-yuan GDP, water-saving irrigation rate, domestic water consumption per capita in urban areas, leakage losses from the water supply network in urban areas, and reclaimed water utilization were the factors that influenced the water-saving levels in the beneficiary areas. The evaluated results were consistent with the ground-truth data observed in the studied areas.【Conclusion】The TOPSIS method based on the AHP-CRITIC combination weighting is reliable for evaluating water-saving levels at regional scale. Our results provide guidelines for optimal allocation of the diverted water to the beneficiary areas in Henan province.
Key words:  Yangtze-to-Huaihe water diversion project; water-saving level; index system; AHP-CRITIC method; TOPSIS method