English
引用本文:戴佳信,李就好,史海滨,等.河套灌区套种模式下综合作物系数的试验研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2017,36(1):.
DAI Jiaxin,LI Jiuhao,SHI Haibin,et al.河套灌区套种模式下综合作物系数的试验研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2017,36(1):.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1629次   下载 2271  
分享到: 微信 更多
河套灌区套种模式下综合作物系数的试验研究
戴佳信, 李就好, 史海滨, 朱 丽, 田德龙, 闫建文, 夏玉红
华南农业大学 水利与土木建筑工程学院, 广州 510642;内蒙古农业大学 水利与土木建筑工程学院,呼和浩特 010018; 内蒙古鄂尔多斯市伊金霍洛旗水利队, 内蒙古 鄂尔多斯 017200;中国水利水电科学研究院 牧区水利科学研究所, 呼和浩特 010020;内蒙古巴彦淖尔市水利科学研究所, 内蒙古 巴彦淖尔 015000
摘要:
依据FAO56作物需水量指南提供的作物系数计算方法,分别计算了内蒙古河套灌区磴口试验站小麦套种覆膜玉米、小麦套种未覆膜玉米、小麦套种油料向日葵3种套种模式下的综合单、双值作物系数。结果表明,3种套种模式下的作物在全生育期内均可迎来2次综合需水高峰;共生阶段的作物系数,单值方法高于双值方法的计算结果,而单一作物独立生长阶段,双值方法高于单值方法的计算结果;无论单值计算还是双值计算的套种作物田间综合ET,当单一作物处于独立生长期时差别不大,而2种作物共同生育阶段的差别较大;将3种作物在套种模式下的生育阶段划分的更加详细并分别命名,为套种模式下作物蒸散量提供更准确的计算依据。
关键词:  套种模式; 综合作物系数; 综合ET; 小麦; 玉米; 油料向日葵
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:
Integrated Crop Coefficients Approach of Interplanting Mode in Hetao Irrigation Area
DAI Jiaxin, LI Jiuhao, SHI Haibin, ZHU Li, TIAN Delong, YAN Jianwen, XIA Yuhong
College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, South China Agriculture University, Guangzhou 510642, China; College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agriculture University, Huhhot 010018, China; 3.Yijinhuoluo, Ordos City, Inner Mongolia Water Resources Team, Ordos 017200, China; 4.Institute of Water Resources for Pastoral Area of China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Huhhot 010020, China; 5.Water Conservancy Science Institute of Bayannur In Inner Mongolia, Bayannur 015000, China
Abstract:
Based on the method which was recommended by FAO, the single and dual crop coefficients for three interplanting modes (wheat interplanting maize with plastic film mulching, wheat interplanting maize without film mulching and wheat interplanting oil sunflower) were calculated respectively. The experimental station was located in Deng Kou, Hetao irrigation district in Inner Mongolia. The results showed that the three interplanting modes had two peaks of water requirement during the whole growth stage. Crop coefficient in coexistence stage showed that the single value calculation results were higher than the dual values approach, while it was contrary in a single crop growth stage. There was significant difference in the coexistence stage and little difference in the independent phase for a single crop whether single or dual crop coefficient approach to calculate the integrated ET for interplanting crops. The article provided more detailed birth stages division and named separately for the crops of interplanting mode, expecting to provide more accurate foundations of calculation for crop evapotranspiration of interplanting mode.
Key words:  interplanting mode; integrated crop coefficient approach; integrated ET; wheat; maize; oil sunflower