淮河上游冬小麦生长关键期旱涝灾害阈值研究

尹周祥; 高 超; 李学文; 阮 甜

引用本文:	尹周祥,高超,李学文,等.淮河上游冬小麦生长关键期旱涝灾害阈值研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2017,36(7):.
	YIN Zhouxiang,GAO Chao,LI Xuewen,et al.淮河上游冬小麦生长关键期旱涝灾害阈值研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2017,36(7):.

【打印本页】【下载PDF全文】【查看/发表评论】【EndNote】【RefMan】【BibTex】

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览高级检索

本文已被：浏览 1708次下载 3253次
分享到：微信更多字体:加大+\|默认\|缩小-
淮河上游冬小麦生长关键期旱涝灾害阈值研究
尹周祥，高超，李学文，阮甜
安徽师范大学国土资源与旅游学院，安徽芜湖 241000；安徽师范大学江淮流域气候变化与水资源研究中心，安徽芜湖 241000；宁波大学地理与空间信息技术系，浙江宁波 315211

摘要:

利用淮河上游地区1961－2015年13个气象站逐日降水数据，计算冬小麦生长关键期（2、3、4月）1个月尺度及3个月尺度SPI值，结合冬小麦产量数据，确定生长关键期对产量灾损率影响的具体时段，在此基础上分析了降水量变化及旱涝灾害空间分布，建立了SPI值与产量灾损率之间的定量关系。结果表明，①生长关键期（SPI3）和4月（SPI1_4）SPI值均与产量灾损率相关性程度高，分别通过0.01和0.05显著性水平检验；2个时段降水量变化整体呈减少趋势，且旱涝灾害空间分布存在一定的差异；②当SPI3值和SPI1_4值分别为-2.23和-1.82时，达到决定发生旱灾时产量灾损的阈值；③SPI3值和SPI1_4值与产量灾损率相关系数分别为0.94和0.82，在典型涝灾年，SPI值与产量灾损率具有线性关系。

关键词: 冬小麦；生长关键期；旱涝灾害阈值；淮河上游

DOI：

分类号:

基金项目:

Threshold Drought and Flooding at Critical Growth Period of Winter Wheat in the Upper Reach of Huai River

YIN Zhouxiang, GAO Chao, LI Xuewen, RUAN Tian

College of Territorial Resources and Tourism, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241000, China;Climate Change and Water Resource Center of Jiang-Huai Basin, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241000, China; Department of Geography & Spatial Information Techniques, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China

Abstract:

Using the precipitation measured daily from 1961—2015 at 13 weather stations in the upper reach of Huai River, we calculated the monthly average and quarterly average SPI of winter wheat during its main growing season (February to March) respectively. Based on the harvest time, we calculated the yield loss rate due to the occurrence of drought and/or flooding in different growing stages, from which we analyzed the spatial distribution and variation of the precipitation, flooding and drought, as well as their relationship with the SPI. The results showed that there was a close correlation between SPI3 for critical growing stage and the SPI for April (SPI4), which passed both the 0.01 and 0.05 confidence tests. The precipitation during the two periods decreased, and there was a difference in the spatial distributions of the drought and flooding as well. The threshold at which a drought could cause agricultural loss was when SPI3 was -2.23 and SPI1_4 was -1.82. The correlation coefficients of SPI3 and SPI1_4 with the agricultural loss rate were 0.94 and 0.82 respectively, and there was a linear relationship between SPI and agricultural loss rate in typical flooding years.

Key words: SPI; winter wheat; growth critical period; threshold of drought and flood disaster; upper reaches of Huaihe River