English
引用本文:吕思思,李 威,苏维词,等.基于山水林田湖草协同/权衡的生态管控分区研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2024,43(9):88-94.
LYU Sisi,LI Wei,SU Weici,et al.基于山水林田湖草协同/权衡的生态管控分区研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2024,43(9):88-94.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1435次   下载 3023 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
基于山水林田湖草协同/权衡的生态管控分区研究
吕思思,李 威,苏维词,赵卫权,罗军华,孙小琼
贵州科学院 贵州省山地资源研究所,贵阳 550001
摘要:
【目的】厘清山、水、林、田、湖、草之间的协同和权衡关系,优化红枫湖流域的生态管控分区,制定科学的分区管理措施。【方法】以红枫湖流域为研究区,分析各子系统在全域和局部空间的协同/权衡关系,探讨基于山、水、林、田、湖、草协同理念的生态管控分区方案。【结果】流域内生产区与生态区的空间分异性明显,林地、草地的主要生态保护功能不同,湖面临高污染风险,除湖子系统调蓄水能力较好的区域外,其他区域农业种植依赖于降水。红枫湖流域可划分为9类生态管控区。【结论】基于协调、权衡关系的分区方法能够保证各类分区生态环境差异的最大化,各分区管理措施差异明显。
关键词:  协同/权衡;生态分区;SOFM;红枫湖流域
DOI:10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2024005
分类号:
基金项目:
Ecological space zoning based on synergies and trade-offs of mountain,water, forest, farmland, lake and grassland
LYU Sisi, LI Wei, SU Weici, ZHAO Weiquan, LUO Junhua, SUN Xiangqiong
Institute of Mountain Resource in Guizhou Province, Guizhou Academy of Science, Guiyang 550001, China
Abstract:
【Objective】This paper is to propose a method to optimize ecological space zoning and develop scientific management strategies for watersheds. The focus is on clarifying the synergies and trade-offs among mountains, waters, forests, farmlands, lakes, and grasslands.【Method】The study takes the Hongfeng Lake watershed as a case study. It is a typical watershed consisting of mountains, water, forests, fields, lakes and grasses. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to calculates synergies and trade-offs between these sub-ecosystems at both basin scale and local scale. The ecological zoning in the watershed was analyzed by considering the synergistic relationships between mountains, waters, forests, farmlands, lakes and grasslands.【Result】The study revealed significant spatial variation in ecological zones within the studied areas. It identified contrasting spatial relationships in the distribution of synergies and trade-offs, particularly between water and other subsystems, as defined by the water intersection line. Key findings include differentiated ecological protection roles of forests and grasslands, high pollution risks facing lakes, and the reliance on rainfall for agriculture outside regions where lakes effectively manage water storage. The watershed was classified into nine ecological control zones, including urban water source protection zones and ecological agricultural zones along the lake and its tributaries. Additionally, mountain areas were designated as ecological industrial development and conservation zones, water source conservation zones, and geo-hazard risk zones. 【Conclusion】By analyzing the coordination and trade-offs among various ecological components, this study ensures the maximization of ecological diversity within each zoning type. The findings highlight the need for tailored management strategies across different zones to address their unique ecological needs and challenges.
Key words:  synergies/tradeoffs; ecological zoning; SOFM; Hongfeng Lake Basin