English
引用本文:王 璐,刘 浩,高福奎,等.不同种植模式和灌水定额对棉花生长和产量的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2023,42(5):16-23.
WANG Lu,LIU Hao,GAO Fukui,et al.不同种植模式和灌水定额对棉花生长和产量的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2023,42(5):16-23.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 671次   下载 498 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
不同种植模式和灌水定额对棉花生长和产量的影响
王 璐,刘 浩,高福奎,宁慧峰,韩其晟,徐雪雯,王兴鹏,李小刚
1.塔里木大学 水利与建筑工程学院,新疆 阿拉尔 843300;2.塔里木大学 现代农业工程 重点实验室,新疆 阿拉尔 843300;3.中国农业科学院 农田灌溉研究所/农业农村部作物需水与 调控重点开放实验室,河南 新乡 453002;4.农业农村部西北绿洲节水农业重点实验室, 新疆 石河子 832000;5.新疆生产建设兵团第一师水文水资源管理中心,新疆 阿拉尔 843300
摘要:
【目的】明确膜下滴灌机采棉的适宜种植模式和最优灌水定额。【方法】设置等行距(M1:1膜3行)、宽窄行(M2:1膜6行)2个种植模式,每个种植模式设置3种灌水定额(W1:30 mm,W2:37.5 mm,W3:45 mm),分析不同种植模式和灌水定额对棉花生长、蕾铃分布、挂枝数、产量和水分利用效率的影响。【结果】种植模式显著影响棉花株高和茎粗,M1处理的株高和茎粗相比M2处理提高了30.29%和13.45%;株高和茎粗随灌水定额的增大而增大,W2处理和W3处理的株高和茎粗差异较小,显著高于W1处理。M1处理有利于增加棉花上部铃和内围铃,且中、上部铃随着灌水量的增加而增加。M1处理的单株成铃数、衣分和籽棉产量相比M2处理分别增加了65.72%、1.46%和3.33%,皮棉产量增加了6.87%。产量随着灌水定额的增加而增加,但水分利用效率差异不显著。【结论】推荐南疆地区机采棉采用等行距(M1)种植模式,最优的灌水定额为37.5 mm(W2),可以促进棉花生长,实现增产。
关键词:  种植模式;灌水定额;机采棉;蕾铃分布;产量;水分利用效率
DOI:10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2022650
分类号:
基金项目:
Effects of Different Planting Patterns and Irrigation Quota on Cotton Growth and Yield
WANG Lu, LIU Hao, GAO Fukui, NING Huifeng, HAN Qisheng, XU Xuewen, WANG Xingpeng, LI Xiaogang
1. College of Water Resource and Architecture Engineering, Tarim University, Alaer 843300, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China; 3. Institute of Farmland Irrigation, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop Water Requirement and Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Xinxiang 453002, China; 4. Key Laboratory of Northwest Oasis Water-saving Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shihezi 832000, China; 5. Hydrology and Water Resources Management Center of the First Division of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Alaer 843300, China
Abstract:
【Objective】In order to solve the problem of high impurity rate in current machine-harvested cotton planting patterns and clarify the suitable planting pattern and corresponding optimal irrigation quota for drip irrigation under mulch in southern Xinjiang.【Method】Treatments of two planting patterns (M1, three rows of cottons under one film with equal row spacing; M2, Six rows of cottons under one film with wide and narrow rows) and three irrigation quotas (W1, 30 mm; W2, 37.5 mm; W3, 45 mm) were conducted to investigate the coupling effects of different planting patterns and irrigation quota on cotton growth, bud and boll distribution, defoliation rate, yield and water use efficiency.【Result】The results showed that planting pattern significantly affected the plant height and stem diameter of cotton. Compared to M2 treatment, the plant height and stem diameter of M1 treatment increased by 30.29% and 13.45%, respectively; the plant height and stem diameter increased with increasing of irrigation quota, and little differences was found between W2 and W3 treatments, but significantly higher than that of W1 treatment. M1 planting mode is more conducive to increase the number of upper and inner bolls, and number of middle and upper bolls increased with increasing of soil water content, thus improved the cotton yield. Compared to M2 treatment, the number of bolls per plant, lint percentage, seed cotton yield and lint yield of M1 treatment increased by 65.72%, 1.46%, 3.33% and 6.87%, respectively. The seed cotton yield increased with increasing irrigation quota, but the differences of water use efficiency among treatments were not significant. The seed cotton yield was followed by W3>W2>W1, and no difference was found between W3 and W2 treatment.【Conclusion】Therefore, the equal row spacing planting mode under machine-harvested was recommended in southern Xinjiang, and the irrigation quota of 37.5 mm was adopted to promote cotton growth and achieve the purpose of increasing yield and efficiency.
Key words:  planting pattern; irrigation quota; machine-harvested cotton; bud and boll distribution; yield; water use efficiency