中文
Cite this article:
【Print this page】   【Download the full text in PDF】   View/Add Comment  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←Previous Article|Next article→ Archive    Advanced Search
This article has been:Browse 1395Times   Download 2367Times 本文二维码信息
scan it!
Font:+|=|-
DOI:10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2022404
Effects of Spring Irrigation on Water and Salt Distribution in Soil and Cotton Growth in Southern Xinjiang
GAO Fukui, WANG Lu, LI Xiaogang, NING Huifeng, HAN Qisheng, LIU Hao, FENG Quanqing
1. Farmland Irrigation Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Crop Water Use and Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Xinxiang 453002, China; 2. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 3. Hydrology and Water Resources Management Center of the First Division of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Alaer 843300, China; 4. College of Water Conservancy and Architecture Engineering, Tarim University, Alaer 843300, China
Abstract:
【Objective】Soil salinity is an abiotic factor facing agriculture production in Xinjiang, and a common remediation is to leach the salt out of the root zone before planting. Taking cotton as an example, this paper studied the efficacy of pre-planting drip irrigation in desalinizing the soil and sustaining cotton growth.【Method】The experiment was conducted in a cotton field. It consisted of two pre-treatments: drip-irrigating 90 mm of water before seed drilling, and conventional flooding irrigation using 180 mm of water before seed drilling. After that the crops were watered ten times using mulched drip irrigation, each irrigating 30 mm (W1), 37.5 mm (W2) or 45 mm (W3) of water. During the experiment, we measured the changes in soil water and salt contents, growth, dry matter accumulation, yield, and water use efficiency of the crop in each treatment. 【Result】 Compared with conventional flooding spring irrigation, spring drip irrigation kept soil moistened enough for seedling emergence; it also significantly increased water content in the 0~80 cm soil layer during the whole growing period. Salt accumulated in the 0~40 cm soil layer, with its EC at bud and boll stages increasing by 7.84% and 8.75%, respectively, compared to that at seedling stage. Soil EC increased as time elapsed in all treatments, but the increase decreased as the irrigation amount increased, with EC in the 0~100 cm soil layer in W1, W2 and W3 increasing by 30.11%, 12.12% and 11.11%, respectively. Increasing irrigation amount also improved plant height, stem diameter, dry matter accumulation, yield and water use efficiency, but reduced irrigation water use efficiency. There was no significant difference in yield and water use efficiency between W1 and W3 regardless of the spring irrigations, but the yield and water use efficiency in W2 differed significantly between the two spring irrigations. 【Conclusion】 Considering cotton yield and water use efficiency, the optimal irrigation quots for the whole growth period is 45 mm combined with a spring drip irrigation of 90 mm to leach the salt out of the root zone. For conventional spring irrigation to leach the salt, the irrigation quots of the 10 subsequent irrigations can be reduced to 37.5 mm in which the seeded cotton yield reached 7 207.81 kg/hm2.
Key words:  drip seeding; cotton field under film drip irrigation; water and salt distribution; yield; water use efficiency