中文
Cite this article:
【Print this page】   【Download the full text in PDF】   View/Add Comment  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←Previous Article|Next article→ Archive    Advanced Search
This article has been:Browse 1000Times   Download 2209Times 本文二维码信息
scan it!
Font:+|=|-
DOI:10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2022473
Effect of Buried Depth and Exit Control of Subsurface Tile on Drainage and Groundwater Depth
SUN Shijun, SU Hui, JIAO Pingjin, SHEN Tao
1. College of Water Conservancy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China; 2. Department of Irrigation and Drainage, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100048, China; 3. Anhui and Huaihe River Institute of Hydraulic Research, Bengbu 233000, China
Abstract:
【Objective】Subsurface tile is a conventional drainage technology to prevent groundwater table from exceeding critical depths and causing waterlogging and soil salinization. In this paper, the effect of buried depth and exit control of the tile on drainage and groundwater depth was examined through field experiment.【Method】The experiment was conducted in the Lixin Drainage Test Area in Bozhou City, Anhui province. The tile length was 200 m and the space between adjacent tiles was 30 m. The exit of each tile was connected to a well with its position either kept at a constant elevation (CWTR) or dynamically controlled (DWTR). Drainage from each tile was measured using an electronic water meter, and change in groundwater depth was measured from a borehole drilled in the middle of the tiles. Groundwater flow in the drainage system was simulated using the DRAINMOD model.【Result】Shallow-burying the tile and CWTR control of the tile exit had similar effect in controlling groundwater depth and reducing drainage. The DWTR and CWTR were both able to reduce the groundwater table dropping and drainage in the early and late crop growth stages. In the middle growth stage, the groundwater depth under DWTR was significantly lower than that under CWTR, and the daily drainage from the former was significantly higher than that from the latter. For the conventional tile layout, the average groundwater depth under DWTR in a wet year was 13.9 cm lower than that under CWTR, and the drainage of the former was 2.1 times as that of the latter. Changes in the elevation of the tile exit in DWTR altered groundwater flow, and it took 7 to 12 days, depending on the tile space, for groundwater flow to reach a new steady state.【Conclusion】Dynamic control of the elevation of the tile exit in subsurface drainage systems can be an effective means to regulate groundwater flow, preventing waterlogging during flood seasons and ensuring sufficient soil moisture during dry seasons.
Key words:  controlled drainage; shallow buried tile; constant water table; dynamic water table; groundwater depth; drainage volume